<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LOW ENERGY</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hulger.info/WP/low-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hulger.info/WP/low-energy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.hulger.info/WP/low-energy/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hulger.info/WP/low-energy/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>You sound like someone who wants to keep things the way they are; nice and boring. None of the things you raise are reasons not to do something more interesting, only problems to resolve in the design process. What is available on the market today is also not a solution because people aren't inspired what's on offer and so uptake is still modest. Phillips are even starting to advertise their bulbs to try and drive sales, but their designs are just like everyone else's so why will people bother?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You sound like someone who wants to keep things the way they are; nice and boring. None of the things you raise are reasons not to do something more interesting, only problems to resolve in the design process. What is available on the market today is also not a solution because people aren&#8217;t inspired what&#8217;s on offer and so uptake is still modest. Phillips are even starting to advertise their bulbs to try and drive sales, but their designs are just like everyone else&#8217;s so why will people bother?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. David Deak</title>
		<link>http://www.hulger.info/WP/low-energy/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. David Deak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 02:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hulger.info/WP/low-energy/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Non uniform light distribution, makes this light a poor design, compounded by the over extended swirls of glass, which of course has the potential of being in the right place at the right time when objects accidently are projected air borne. This give a greater chance of mercury, phosphor, and glass slivers being exposed to humans and pets. Enough with pollution and toxic substances being introduced to our environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Non uniform light distribution, makes this light a poor design, compounded by the over extended swirls of glass, which of course has the potential of being in the right place at the right time when objects accidently are projected air borne. This give a greater chance of mercury, phosphor, and glass slivers being exposed to humans and pets. Enough with pollution and toxic substances being introduced to our environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
